Shared conversation
Religious Liberty and the Ethics of Church Disfellowship
Is it ethical for a church to enforce creeds at the cost of conscience?
Considering all that has been covered is this chat, is it right or good for the current SDA denomination and leadership to disfellowship those fellow believers who take a non-trinitarian position regarding the true Fatherhood of God and the literal divine Sonship of Jesus and choose to take the bible "as it reads"?
AdventAI
The imposition of religious creeds by civil or ecclesiastical power has historically led to the subversion of religious liberty and the persecution of "otherwise good citizens" for their conscientious dissent. It is a sacred duty to maintain the principle that man's relation to God is above human legislation and that a "Thus saith the Lord" must never be set aside for a "Thus saith the church" or state.
The Danger of Enforced Creeds
Historical Precedent: History reveals that when a specific creed is established and enforced by power, those who do not subscribe to it—such as Arius or Trinitarian dissenters depending on the emperor—face banishment or death.
The Rights of Conscience: Religious liberty is an inalienable right, and no power, whether civil or religious, has the right to dictate in matters purely of conscience or to settle theological disputes by legislative enactment.
The Example of the Reformers: True reformers chose to sacrifice their lives and dominions rather than consent to localize religious liberty or admit the right of authority to coerce conscience.
The Nature of the Godhead and Liberty
Valid Non-Trinitarian Points: It is recognized as correct that there is only one God in the ultimate executive sense, the Father, and that the oneness of the Father and Son refers to purpose rather than person John 17:3.
The Dignity of the Atonement: Some believe that the Trinitarian view actually degrades the Atonement by suggesting only a human nature could die, whereas a literal divine Sonship ensures a truly divine sacrifice.
The Inconsistency of Coercion: It is inconsistent for those who have suffered for their faith to use the power of the state or church to enforce their own beliefs on others through force, exile, or imprisonment.
The Christian Duty Toward Dissent
Avoiding a Combative Spirit: Dealing with questions of religious liberty in a criticizing or combative spirit recoils upon the church and prevents many from receiving the truth.
Maintaining Freedom for All: Asserting one's own right to believe is not true religious liberty; true religious liberty is the assertion of the right of others to believe according to their own dictates.
The Final Accountability: Every individual shall give an account of himself to God, and therefore one brother should not judge or set at naught another brother in matters of faith Romans 14:10-12.
May we always remember that the banner of religious liberty must be held aloft, recognizing that God's word is the supreme authority above all human legislation. 🕊️
Sources · 18
- AMS January 16, 1890, page 19.2The American Sentinel 5
- AMS April 30, 1896, page 138.20The American Sentinel 11
- AMS March 21, 1895, page 22.6The American Sentinel 10
- GW 389.2Gospel Workers (1915 ed.)
- GC88 295.2The Great Controversy (1888 ed.)
- GEP 555.1The Great Empires of Prophecy, from Babylon to the Fall of Rome
- GC88 200.1The Great Controversy (1888 ed.)
- SPCCSR 136.2Spirit of Prophecy Counsels Relating To Church-State Relationships
- BDOC 66.34The Godhead for Seventh-day Adventists
- AERS 164.2The Atonement
- AERS 173.1The Atonement
- ATO 155.1The Atonement
- SBBS 412.7Source Book for Bible Students
- SBBS 413.1Source Book for Bible Students
- SWR 5Slavery—Will It Be Revived?
- TDC May 7, 1889, page 4.13The Topeka Daily Capital, vol. 11
- TTR 851.2The Two Republics, or Rome and the United States of America
- MEDM March 1906, page 82.5The Medical Missionary, vol. 15