Shared conversation
SOP on Women's Pants: Modesty, Health, and Dress Distinction
Does the SOP condemn all forms of trousers worn by women?
What does SOP say about women wearing pants?
AdventAI
The truth concerning women's attire emphasizes modesty, health, and maintaining a clear distinction in dress between males and females, which explicitly condemns styles that imitate the opposite sex, but mandates the thorough clothing of the limbs for health, often recommending trousers as undergarments for this purpose.
Condemnation of Styles that Erase Distinction
God’s clear direction is that women should not adopt a style of dress that pertains to a man, nor should a man put on a woman’s garment, because all who do so are an abomination to the Lord God Deuteronomy 22:5. This means that adopting the "American costume," or any style of dress that does away with the distinction of dress between males and females, is wholly unfitting for modest, humble followers of Christ.
The attempt by some to carry dress reform to extremes, imitating the opposite sex by wearing the cap, pants, vest, coat, and boots, is objectionable and leads to confusion. Those who feel called to join movements supporting woman's rights and this extreme form of dress reform might as well sever all connection with the message, as the spirit attending such movements cannot be in harmony with divine truth. When God's people adopt such costumes, their influence is dead, and people often mistakenly place them on the level with Spiritualists, who had previously adopted similar singular modes of dress.
The Mandate for Healthful Limb Coverage
While adopting masculine attire is condemned, it is impossible for women to have health when their limbs and feet are habitually cold, and the fashionable style of dress is considered one of the greatest causes of terrible diseases. It is essential that females clothe their limbs as thoroughly as the males, regardless of the length of the dress.
To ensure an equal distribution of clothing and maintain equal circulation, the extremities, being remote from the vital organs, must be thoroughly protected with warm coverings. This vital principle of health may be accomplished by wearing lined pants that are gathered into a band and fastened about the ankle, or made full and tapering at the bottom, coming down long enough to meet the shoe. These warm, lined pants protect the limbs and ankles against currents of air, ensuring circulation is equalized, which keeps the blood healthy and pure.
Evolution of the Reform Dress
Historically, the reform dress advocated and adopted in the 1860s was intended to be a blessing that provided a healthful, comfortable, and modest attire, which called for loose-fitting garments hung from the shoulders with the hemline about nine inches from the floor. This style necessarily included a trouser-like garment for the lower limbs to provide comfort and warmth.
However, the specific adoption of the short reform dress proved a battle at every step, creating dissension and controversy among members. Due to resistance and the fact that it was sometimes turned into a curse, the burden of advocating that specific style of reform dress was removed. God allowed the testimony concerning that dress to become silent so that those with pride in their hearts might follow their own inclination, thereby proving that they needed the restriction the dress imposed.
A more sensible style of dress has since been adopted, which avoids the objectionable features of long, trailing skirts and ridiculous hoops. This acceptable style consists of a plain sacque or loose-fitting basque and a skirt short enough to avoid the mud and filth of the streets. While the specific length of the original reform dress (nine inches from the floor) is no longer mandated, the health principles remain, and the same attention must be given to the clothing of the limbs as with the short dress.
The Lord has not indicated that it is the duty of sisters to go back to the specific reform dress of the past, and there must be no branching out into singular forms of dress that create unnecessary controversy. Instead, sisters should dress plainly, using good, durable, and modest material appropriate for this age, ensuring that the dress question does not distract the mind from the grand test of the commandments of God.
Sources · 29
- 2SM 477.8Selected Messages Book 2
- 2SM 478.3Selected Messages Book 2
- T10 30.4Testimony for the Church — No. 10
- 1T 421.2Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1
- 1T 459.8Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1
- T11 2.3Testimony for the Church — No. 11
- 1T 457.1Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1
- RH February 6, 1900, par. 7The Review and Herald
- T10 30.5Testimony for the Church — No. 10
- 1T 421.4Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1
- HR January 1, 1877, par. 7The Health Reformer
- HL 64.2Healthful Living
- HR April 1, 1872, par. 12The Health Reformer
- T11 7.2Testimony for the Church — No. 11
- HR May 1, 1872, par. 9The Health Reformer
- HR May 1, 1872, par. 15The Health Reformer
- 3SM 253.2Selected Messages Book 3
- PH134 13.3The Dress Reform
- T30 160.3Testimony for the Church — No. 30
- HR May 1, 1872, par. 10The Health Reformer
- 5MR 404.4Manuscript Releases, vol. 5 [Nos. 260-346]
- PH104 11.1Testimony To the Brethren in Western New York
- 4T 639.3Testimonies for the Church, vol. 4
- 3SM 253.3Selected Messages Book 3
- 12LtMs, Lt 19, 1897, par. 7Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 12 (1897)
- T30 167.2Testimony for the Church — No. 30
- SHM-apx 441The Story of Our Health Message
- SpM 91.3Spalding and Magan Collection
- 14LtMs, Lt 45, 1899, par. 7Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 14 (1899)